[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:57:40 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
Subject: Re: Dynamic linker name
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:47:10AM +0800, Lei Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make a few changes to clang/LLVM to make it work with
> musl, i.e. link executables against musl instead of glibc.
>
> One of the changes involved is to tell clang where to find musl's
> dynamic linker. My question is: is musl's dynamic linker always named
> "ld-musl-$ARCH.so.1" and put under /lib?
>
> More specifically, on a multilib system, which of the following is encouraged?
>
> 1. /lib/ld-musl-{x86,x86_64}.so.1
> 2. /lib32/ld-musl-x86.so.1 and /lib64/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1
It's always /lib/, not /lib32/ or /lib64/.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
