Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 05:20:54 +0000 From: Jaydeep Patil <Jaydeep.Patil@...tec.com> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> CC: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix atomic_arch.h for MIPS32 R6 >-----Original Message----- >From: Rich Felker [mailto:dalias@...ifal.cx] On Behalf Of Rich Felker >Sent: 30 March 2016 PM 08:58 >To: Jaydeep Patil >Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com >Subject: Re: [musl] [PATCH] Fix atomic_arch.h for MIPS32 R6 > >On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:29:26AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: >> Since I've done most of the thinking about the above issues already >> and have a patch for some of them, let me prepare a complete patch and >> send it to the list for you to check and make sure it meets your needs >> for r6. I should be able to prepare it very quickly. Then we can look >> at applying the same changes to the n32 port and reviewing it. > >Can you see if the attached patch works for you? It not only adds r6 support >but improves support for non-baseline (i.e. > mips1) ISA levels by optimizing >out the unnecessary .set's (which hurt gcc's inlining, because gcc is dumb >about them) and lifts the $3 register restriction on rdhwr for ISA levels where >the instructions are known to be available natively. The patch works fine. I have tried it for mips32 r2-r6, mips64 r2-r6, micromips32 r2-r5. I have tried it with both GCC and Clang 3.9.0 compilers. >Rich Thanks, Jaydeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.