Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:02:22 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: libc-bench license On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:39:30AM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > Michael McConville wrote: > > While we're on the topic of licensing, what's the license for > > libc-bench? There doesn't seem to be one mentioned anywhere in the > > source or on the website. > > Never mind, the most recent commit adds an MIT license: > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/libc-bench/commit/ Yep. For what it's worth, the current benchmarks are not very good/useful IMO and they haven't been touched in years. But they might contain some good ideas for writing new/better ones and having the code permissively licensed makes it easy to reuse snippets without having to worry about license problems. I'd love to see a new framework for measuring performance of libc interfaces that are performance-relevant. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.