Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:37:12 -0800 From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: iproute2 & other software > On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@...il.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Stephen (iproute2) sent me a mail telling me that he rejected my patch to iproute2 for musl support: > > 1st reply: > " > I was waiting for others who had more to say on this. > Ok with providing small fixes, but can't really guarantee iproute to > work with other libraries. > " > > & 2nd is : > " > Sorry, I have to reject this. > All include files in include/linux come from headers automatically generated from upstream > Linux source. This is the only way to ensure long term ABI/API consistency > with kernel. > > Either fix musl or submit patches to upstream kernel and get them merged. > “ Where is your patch. > > Can we look into providing somekind of compatibility layer for header files so that it's easier to get upstream projects like iproute2 to support musl ? > > Kind regards, > //Logan > C-x-C-c > Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (205 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.