Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:19:13 +0000 From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: iproute2 & other software Hi All, Stephen (iproute2) sent me a mail telling me that he rejected my patch to iproute2 for musl support: 1st reply: " I was waiting for others who had more to say on this. Ok with providing small fixes, but can't really guarantee iproute to work with other libraries. " & 2nd is : " Sorry, I have to reject this. All include files in include/linux come from headers automatically generated from upstream Linux source. This is the only way to ensure long term ABI/API consistency with kernel. Either fix musl or submit patches to upstream kernel and get them merged. " Can we look into providing somekind of compatibility layer for header files so that it's easier to get upstream projects like iproute2 to support musl ? Kind regards, //Logan C-x-C-c Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.