Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:04:48 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Missing defines in utmpx.h On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:53:18AM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > > I just tried to compile the latest busybox with musl and failed > because of a change in busybox to include utmpx.h in case of UTMP > support and header presence. > > The problem seems to be that busybox assumes some defines in utmpx.h > that are usually in utmp.h and glibc (and possibly other libc's) set > them in utmpx.h, but musl doesn't. > > I think it were > > _PATH_UTMP and _PATH_WTMP > > > I worked around the issue by disabling UTMP support, but maybe this > could be fixed in musl? I don't think it would hurt to change this (I'll check later) but generally you should disable utmp support on musl-based systems anyway. musl's utmp is intentionally stubbed out to do nothing, and some programs print spurious runtime warnings/errors too if it's enabled. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.