Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:59:31 +0200
Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: Update: 
 pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:43:39AM +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
> gcj uses boehm-gc. Alpine has patches for gcc boehm-gc. We are also
> patching gcc's gcj. You can see our full patch set at:

I see now.

My musl-related tweaks to boehm-gc were insufficient,
missing the ones for

Testing with these fixes applied...
... 3 hours later the build is ready.

Now it does not crash (of course) in any situation where I test.

> Some of these may or may not fix the issue you have at had. Not sure
> how your gcc/gcj is built.

Thanks a lot Timo!

I overestimated the compatibility of gcc-5.2 with musl.

Apologies for unfounded doubts of musl correctness.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.