Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:59:31 +0200 From: u-uy74@...ey.se To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: Update: pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:43:39AM +0300, Timo Teras wrote: > gcj uses boehm-gc. Alpine has patches for gcc boehm-gc. We are also > patching gcc's gcj. You can see our full patch set at: > http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/gcc I see now. My musl-related tweaks to boehm-gc were insufficient, missing the ones for boehm-gc/dyn_load.c boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h Testing with these fixes applied... ... 3 hours later the build is ready. Now it does not crash (of course) in any situation where I test. > Some of these may or may not fix the issue you have at had. Not sure > how your gcc/gcj is built. Thanks a lot Timo! I overestimated the compatibility of gcc-5.2 with musl. Apologies for unfounded doubts of musl correctness. Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.