Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:43:39 +0300 From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi> To: u-uy74@...ey.se Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: Update: pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:27:54 +0200 u-uy74@...ey.se wrote: > > I think you really need to find a way to use what debugging tools > > you have to figure out what's going on and where the actual source > > of the crash is. > > Pretty remarkably, neither my usual gdb nor Debian's current gdb were > able to make sence of the crashes. Probably the thread states became > messed up too badly. > > Fortunately I do not think any longer that musl is the culprit, nor do > I actually need gcj, otherwise have a workaround. Will not pursue this > issue further. > > Thanks for your feedback, sorry for the noise. gcj uses boehm-gc. Alpine has patches for gcc boehm-gc. We are also patching gcc's gcj. You can see our full patch set at: http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/gcc Some of these may or may not fix the issue you have at had. Not sure how your gcc/gcj is built. /Timo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.