Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:37:24 -0700 From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: linux/vt.h On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 06:01:30AM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:27 AM, vlse <vlse@...ra.biz> wrote: >> > But then why do sabotage uses modified/adapted kernel headers. >> >> Good question. Conventional wisdom states that one must keep the >> headers glibc was compiled against, not the headers of the current >> kernel, but the why is never explained. Does it apply here (with >> s/glibc/musl)? > > This does not apply whatsoever to musl since musl does not use kernel > headers at all -- unless you want to count the few wrappers in sys/*.h > which this thread is about, but musl is not actually "using" the > kernel headers here, just helping applications that use the official > <sys/*.h> includes find the kernel headers for their own use. > Thanks, clear enough. Jorge
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.