[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DC1DDE.4020009@openwrt.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:48:46 +0200
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
Cc: Bobby Bingham <koorogi@...rogi.info>, openwrt-devel@...ts.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: SuperH conflict of arch/sh/__set_thread_area vs
thread/__set_thread_area
On 2015-08-21 16:23, Rich Felker wrote:
>> 2. patch patch-kernel.sh
>>
>> ---
>> --- a/scripts/patch-kernel.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/patch-kernel.sh
>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ for i in ${patchdir}/${patchpattern} ; do
>> [ -d "${i}" ] && echo "Ignoring subdirectory ${i}" && continue
>> echo ""
>> echo "Applying ${i} using ${type}: "
>> - ${uncomp} ${i} | ${PATCH:-patch} -f -p1 -E -d ${targetdir}
>> + ${uncomp} ${i} | ${PATCH:-patch} -f -p1 -d ${targetdir}
>> if [ $? != 0 ] ; then
>> echo "Patch failed! Please fix $i!"
>> exit 1
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Does anyone have any preferences? I'm opting for "patch patch-kernel"
>> (and I will send a proper patch next week to OpenWRT even if no one
>> cares now :-D )
>
> This seems like a better approach to me, but I don't know if it would
> adversely affect the kernel or other components.
Applied this change in r46723 - I don't expect any side effects in the
kernel or other components, since this flag seems to be relevant for
non-standard patch formats only, and we usually keep our patches consistent.
- Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
