Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:54:03 -0400
From: stephen Turner <stephen.n.turner@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: nsz libc-test

so ideally with a musl system what kind of report output can i expect? the
report i have is from a broken system, would someone happen to have a
report from a working musl system?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:28 AM, stephen Turner <stephen.n.turner@...il.com
> wrote:

> You're not going to get any meaningful results without removing
>> -pedantic-errors from the config.mak. pcc is erroring out due to the
>> unrecognized option without building any tests.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>
> Thanks Rich, I found and removed the setting in the makefile and re-ran
> the test.
>
> I have been using some shell code to identify pcc and make adjustments,
> its super crude but here it is. Perhaps something along these lines could
> be added to the nsz libc test.
>
> if command -v pcc >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> export CC=pcc
> else
> export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS --static"
> fi
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.