Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:49:21 +0200 From: "piranna@...il.com" <piranna@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: static build and dlopen Yes I know, I put it as example of the glibc case before I started using musl to try to solve it since glibc static link didn't worked for me, I know that musl one is /lib/ld-musl-i386.so.1. 2014-09-02 2:38 GMT+02:00 Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 01:38:55AM +0200, piranna@...il.com wrote: >> Sorry for the delay, I have been busy these days. >> >> First of all, you were right: It possible to use dynamically linked >> executables for PID 1, seems I was missing one of the libraries >> (probably /lib/ld-linux.so.2... :-/ ). > > A heads-up: This should not exist if you're using musl. If it seems to > be needed, you incorrectly linked against glibc, not musl, or possibly > even a mix of the two, and stuff is likely to break very badly. The > musl dynamic linker is named /lib/ld-musl-$(ARCH).so.1 where $(ARCH) > would be i386 or x86_64 for 32- or 64-bit x86 systems, and something > like mips, mipsel, arm, armhf, etc. for other common systems. > > Rich -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.