Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:48:11 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Bug on fstat()? On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:49:03AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * piranna@...il.com <piranna@...il.com> [2014-08-25 11:31:28 +0200]: > > > So, is g++ mandatory for compilation? Is there any solution? I'll try > > > to set CXX to musl-gcc too, but didn't see anything about this and I'm > > > not sure if it would work... If it doesn't work, would I need to > > > create a musl-g++ wrapper? > > > > Confirmed: doesn't work, it has failed just in the first C++ source > > code file it has found: > > > > musl-gcc is just a thin gcc wrapper (uses a custom spec file > to locate the standard headers and other libc files) > > eg. it does not have a libstdc++ linked against musl so it > cannot build c++ code In principle it should be possible to make it work. libstdc++.so actually works fine with musl due to the ABI-compat; the problem is the nasty precompiled header files that have already pulled in junk from glibc's headers. If there's a way around that, it may be possible to get musl-gcc working with C++. Nobody has tried it yet as far as I know, though. > use a musl cross compiler for your target with c++ support > (eg http://musl.codu.org/ has prebuilt ones but you can build > musl-cross yourself) or build on a musl based system (sabotage > or alpinelinux, they probably already have node.js packaged) Yes, this is the best option. You might need to tweak their builds to get a static binary though. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.