Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:12:12 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Locale bikeshed time On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:03:00PM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 22/07/2014 21:36, Rich Felker wrote: > >Do you have in mind a usage case this would be beneficial for? > > Not particularly - again, I'm far from a locale expert. But you > seem reluctant to reuse LOCPATH for mixed musl+glibc installations, > and also reluctant to break an established convention, so having I was not reluctant to break established convention here, but reluctant to add new variables systems integrators and administrators need to be aware of (for the sake of preserving them or filtering them). But I think the alternative is worse. > both would cater to all use cases - LOCPATH for the principle of > least surprise and general use, and MUSL_LOCPATH for people who > know what they are doing and need a different variable. I'm not seeing a way that setting LOCPATH without being aware that the app you're trying to affect is using musl could be helpful. The locales you're trying to make visible to the app need to be in the format used by musl, not the glibc format, so you have to already be aware of this. Maybe there's something I'm not seeing -- this is why I asked -- but if there's no reason for it, I think searching both "just because" is bad. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.