[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140606193920.GF6051@example.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 21:39:20 +0200
From: u-igbb@...ey.se
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl 1.0.x branch
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:56:17PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I'm about to prepare the 1.0.3 release, and I've been thinking a bit
> about the future of the 1.0.x branch. Specifically I'd like to gauge
> the extent to which it's being used. So far cherry-picking fixes to it
For us (the "Dapty" software repository at Aetey) there is no such thing
as a "system-wide-version of the c library", neither any corresponding
upgrade barrier whatsoever.
>From this point of view, given the ABI stability a single supported
branch (in such a case "trunk") is fully sufficient.
Thanks for musl, it is a pleasure to build against it.
Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
