Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:14:03 -0500 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1 On 08/13/2013 11:00:52 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:53:00PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > * Jens <jensl@...s.mine.nu> [2013-08-13 13:18:27 +0200]: > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > > > > > >you didn't tell us the problem > > > > > > > >at least show a crashing dynamic linked executable > > > >with straced loader and musl ldd output > > > > > > Sorry. Its actually linking the binary that doesnt work. > > > > > > > ah ok i did not see that > > > > i'd check libc.so if there is some obvious error > > ld should be able to handle it > > (eg file libc.so, readelf -a libc.so, nm -D libc.so, or just > ./libc.so) > > > > since you use landley's weird toolchain it may be a > > problem with the old binutils > > Indeed, that toolchain is probably already using its own gcc wrapper > around the real gcc located at a different path. Neither wrapper is > sufficiently transparent to allow another wrapper around it to > function 100% correctly, so I would guess this is your problem. See if > you can find the location of the real gcc binary and have musl-gcc run > that, or perhaps just get a compiler from the musl-cross package or > compile your own toolchain. You can trivially disable the aboriginal wrapper by replacing x86_64-cc with rawcc, but I _thought_ this was working at one point... Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.