Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:17:41 -0500 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>, Jens <jensl@...s.mine.nu> Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1 On 08/13/2013 09:53:00 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Jens <jensl@...s.mine.nu> [2013-08-13 13:18:27 +0200]: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > > > >you didn't tell us the problem > > > > > >at least show a crashing dynamic linked executable > > >with straced loader and musl ldd output > > > > Sorry. Its actually linking the binary that doesnt work. > > > > ah ok i did not see that > > i'd check libc.so if there is some obvious error > ld should be able to handle it > (eg file libc.so, readelf -a libc.so, nm -D libc.so, or just > ./libc.so) > > since you use landley's weird toolchain it may be a > problem with the old binutils I do test build musl with that toolchain from time to time, and I've modified the binutils in it to support what musl needs before. I'm doing a fresh test build under the most recent Aboriginal x86-64 system image in another window, but this netbook is slow and qemu is slower... > > bash-4.1# musl-gcc -c t.c > > bash-4.1# musl-gcc t.o I note that "bash-4.1" is not the version in my system images but it _is_ in the Linux From Scratch images. He didn't say what architecture he was building for, but I haven't made it to the end of the thread yet... Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.