Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:51:07 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Agenda for next release? On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:06:12PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On 12/31/2012 01:11:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >Another port (perhaps x32, like originally proposed) is also > >definitely an option if anybody's up for doing it. I had considered > >doing it myself in this release cycle, but I'm a bit busy with some > >other projects for at least a couple weeks so I'd rather not get > >bogged down in a big time-eater right away, and instead spend my time > >with musl on small isolated feature additions and bug fixes. > > > >Anything else I missed? > > From my point of view sh4, sparc32 support are interesting because > switching aboriginal to musl would either have to drop support for > those two platforms or support two libcs in parallel. (m68k and > s390x are of secondary interest becauase those are the platforms > I've been trying to add. In theory mips64 is currently supported but > in practice it's deeply flaky at the kernel and possibly qemu level; > not widely used.) > > Not priorities, just thought I'd chip in... Thanks! And good to see you again! I'd be interested in seeing these ports too, but like I said above now is not the best time for me to start doing a new port myself. So unless somebody else wants to try a shot at it, these will probably have to wait a bit. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.