Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:06:12 -0600 From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Agenda for next release? On 12/31/2012 01:11:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > Another port (perhaps x32, like originally proposed) is also > definitely an option if anybody's up for doing it. I had considered > doing it myself in this release cycle, but I'm a bit busy with some > other projects for at least a couple weeks so I'd rather not get > bogged down in a big time-eater right away, and instead spend my time > with musl on small isolated feature additions and bug fixes. > > Anything else I missed? From my point of view sh4, sparc32 support are interesting because switching aboriginal to musl would either have to drop support for those two platforms or support two libcs in parallel. (m68k and s390x are of secondary interest becauase those are the platforms I've been trying to add. In theory mips64 is currently supported but in practice it's deeply flaky at the kernel and possibly qemu level; not widely used.) Not priorities, just thought I'd chip in... Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.