Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:02:09 +0800 From: orc <orc@...server.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: ldso: dlclose. On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:48:16 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote: > Anyway, unless the issue is fixed in binutils so that the vast > majority of libraries are marked non-unloadable, I don't see anything > we can do in musl. "glibc does it that way too" is not an excuse for > adding unsafe/non-robust behavior to musl. > > Rich The whole dlopen/dlclose/dlsym functions family are 'harmful': even if we want static linking, application will still rely on them and fail invisibly, creating more headaches. I think better leave dlclose() in it's current state now. It will always 'success', nobody will care.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.