Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:44:42 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Todo for release? On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:24:13PM -0500, Richard Pennington wrote: > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 02:57:09 PM Rich Felker wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:45:01PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Very helpful would be support for fts.h in musl: > > > > > > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man3/fts.3.html > > > > Can these functions be implemented purely as library functionality, > > without any hooks into libc internals? I was thinking it might be nice > > to isolate all such code into a single subtree in musl, so that folks > > wanting to use it outside musl (either directly in application source > > trees, or in libraries) could easily find and use it. > > > > Of course there's also the option of putting such code in a separate > > library outside of libc (i.e. not including it in libc) which some > > people might prefer, but if it's small and historically in libcs and > > doesn't create maintenance burden, I'm not opposed to having it in > > libc.. > > > > Rich > > I used the NetBSD version and it built with musl just fine with no internal > stuff, as I recall. > > http://ellcc.org/viewvc/svn/ellcc/trunk/libecc/src/musl/src/bsd/ How big is it? I looked at it casually earlier today and didn't see anything horribly offensive in the code; it looks to even get allocation failure error cases right. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.