Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:24:13 -0500 From: Richard Pennington <rich@...nware.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> Subject: Re: Todo for release? On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 02:57:09 PM Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:45:01PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > > Hi, > > Very helpful would be support for fts.h in musl: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man3/fts.3.html > > Can these functions be implemented purely as library functionality, > without any hooks into libc internals? I was thinking it might be nice > to isolate all such code into a single subtree in musl, so that folks > wanting to use it outside musl (either directly in application source > trees, or in libraries) could easily find and use it. > > Of course there's also the option of putting such code in a separate > library outside of libc (i.e. not including it in libc) which some > people might prefer, but if it's small and historically in libcs and > doesn't create maintenance burden, I'm not opposed to having it in > libc.. > > Rich I used the NetBSD version and it built with musl just fine with no internal stuff, as I recall. http://ellcc.org/viewvc/svn/ellcc/trunk/libecc/src/musl/src/bsd/ -Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.