Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:34:36 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Todo for release? On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:57:26PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 8/15/12 6:08 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > >On hold pending details on what the real problem is; unlikely to make > >it in for next release. > > > >Luca, if you still want this, please provide details on what issues > >you're facing that could be solved. I don't want to target old > >versions of standards unless there's a concrete practical goal. I > >mentioned one possible approach (using old versions only as a way to > >reenable stuff that was removed from the standard, not a way to get > >the entire outdated-standard behavior that would also require removing > >new symbols) but I haven't heard back on whether that would meet your > >needs. > > Your approach would be fine even making something wrong like > exposing all the symbols would be ok for my specific purposes. Could you explain a little bit what the problem is, like "I'm trying to build X and function Y is undeclared" or similar? Before trying to address the issue, I'd like to know what problem it's solving. :-) Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.