|
|
Message-ID: <20120815133257.GM20243@port70.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:32:57 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Todo for release?
* Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2012-08-15 12:20:29 +0200]:
> the main justification i see is that
> we already support bsd err and warn
> apis which are required to print
> the __progname as well
> (currently they don't and actually
> a simple warn("hi"); segfaults here
> with musl but i havent investigated
> it)
it seems warn(0) and err(1,0) segfault
(they should handle fmt==0 before passing
it to vfprintf)
and they do not print the ': ' nor the
__progname
(perror works correctly)
test program:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <err.h>
int main()
{
warn("warntest");
warn(0);
perror("perrortest");
perror("");
perror(0);
}
$ gcc err.c && ./a.out
a.out: warntest: Success
a.out: Success
perrortest: Success
Success
Success
$ musl-gcc err.c && ./a.out
warntestNo error information
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.