Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:06:02 +0800 From: orc <orc@...server.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] xattr syscalls On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:21:48 -0700 Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:13:32 -0700 > Isaac Dunham <idunham@...abit.com> wrote: > > > This patch series is basically a reworked version of orc's previous > > patch. > > From what orc said, the first patch should provide enough to build > > Xorg; I haven't tested this yet. > > A few more patches are syscall wrappers (splice) or trivial > > functions (finite). > > Here's support for the xattr syscalls. orc probably knows better than > I what these are needed for... > > Isaac Dunham They were required by some gtk2 apps when I tested musl and gtk2 'direct' compatibility. It failed, syscalls remained. They were tagged in my patch as '// Why even libc needs them' comment, then I removed it and put into final patch just because someone can need it (as happened with Xorg).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.