Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:09:13 +0800 From: orc <orc@...server.ru> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Hello On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:54:08 -0400 (EDT) idunham@...abit.com wrote: > Converting a system (as described in musl/INSTALL) does not mean > replacing libc; it means a parallel install of musl, move system libs > out of the default search path, then change gcc to use musl by > default. It would work even with an ABI-incompatible libc, since you > leave ld-linux alone. I still think that this is a generally bad idea - having dancing around to just make it work with musl. I will do rebuild instead, with reduced number of packages. (Nvidia was as an exception here: it is binary blob designed to work only with glibc)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.