Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:19:00 +0200 From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Vision for new platform >> I understand that and instead systemd I prefer to stay with >> sysvinit+openrc... but the only solution is to prepare a new init >> stuff from scratch (systemd+udev+dbus alternative). Do you see another >> solution? > > Maybe new init stuff, maybe daemon that will control other daemons and > get launched from inittab for example. > I'm just trying to warn that this must not be a second systemd and > that's all. Sure that adequate non-bloated alternative should exist. > Maybe it should be developed as a part of new platform that we > all want to have, because as an alternative alone it will not be > accepted well. musl libc is an alternative to glibc etc. We talk about the vision of a new platform, so if this new solution would arise, then its natural that init stuff should be developed as a project related to musl. The main question is whether we should start such a project (new init) or may remain with existing init (sysvinid / systemd / runit etc.)? Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.