Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:10:25 +0200 From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Hello On 06/07/2012 08:03 PM, Jens Staal wrote: > 2012/6/7 John Spencer<maillist-musl@...fooze.de>: >> On 06/07/2012 05:18 PM, orc wrote: >> what kept me from configuring X11 to work properly is its huge freaking >> complexity. >> if an older version is simpler and can do the job as well, i'm all for it. >> i fear though that you won't get any up-to-date software compiled against >> it. >> probably not worth the effort. >> >> --JS > What about Tiny Core Linux's "tinyX", and perhaps one could even > compile that statically? I have no idea how compatible that is to > Xorg's X11 though... Another appealing alternative could be if there > is a small X11 layer to run on top of Wayland, if that would be easier > to build/configure. > that's what sabotage currently uses http://www.x-oz.com/Xfbdev.1.html "Xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.