Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 23:01:06 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: getpass misplaced On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:25:50PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > I know getpass is an atrocious security mistake of years ago, but > if we are going to support it, glibc defines it with GNU, BSD, or *old* > X/Open feature macros in <unistd.h>, not <pwd.h>. Fixed. > Also, I've found two more headers that actually don't need _BSD_SOURCE > added before they offer the BSD functionality (all BSD functions are > also available in every other relevant namespace): pwd.h and utmp.h. OK. > This has me down to 22 headers that still need work/reviewing. Here's > the TODO for _BSD_SOURCE: > > include/tgmath.h This is purely C99 stuff; I don't think GNU would add anything. > include/glob.h We don't support the extensions here, and even if we want to have the macros for extension flags, they seem to be in the reserved namespace and thus ok to defined unconditionall. > include/shadow.h > include/endian.h These are nonstandard and in principle don't need any feature test macros. However, we use them in endian.h so that other headers can include endian.h. > <netinet/in.h> could cause breakage without extension. I forget > exactly what the problem was, though. ..what? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.