[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 22:04:35 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] _BSD_SOURCE for unistd.h, take 2
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:45:34PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> This is what was left from the comments.
>
> This adds L_SET & co., and defines 5 functions that had been under
> _GNU_SOURCE only, when _BSD_SOURCE is defined.
> If I wanted to make things a little easier on those porting, I might
> add something like this when _BSD_SOURCE is defined:
> #warn "BSD setpgrp should be changed to setpgid"
> That's not essential, though.
The mismatching prototype should be enough to get a nice error. :)
Anyway, patch looks good now. Should I start committing or do you want
to prepare a unified patch for all the headers?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
