Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:25:07 +0200 From: Luka Marčetić <paxcoder@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cluts review On 07/13/2011 07:05 PM, Solar Designer wrote: [...] Maybe my Thunderbird is impotent, but this list gets swamped pretty fast. Anyway, so I need SA_NODEFER because the handler doesn't return, understood. As for the sigsetjmp and stuff, that's what we had before. And yet again, I forgot why it was deprecated (I think there was signal structs being different across platforms, though I'm not sure where the problem was), but anyway Rich suggested sigaction. This reminds me, the code is distinctly C99, and it tests SUSv4 functions, so if you don't mind, for cluts, I'll use those two standards and go back to SA_NODEFER. If I decide to pay more attention to that distributed computer project of yours in the future (I thought there would be some smart CS people applying for that one), then the situation will probably be different ;-) Oh, and I do believe I know aht "clobbered" means (overwriting the new value of the variable with the old one, from when the context was saved, right?). That's what I've said I've checked with buf.c. I'll check it for other relevant collections now too... Will push new minor fixes in a few minutes. Luka. P.S. Perhaps I should start thinking about how the final cluts.c will look like, otherwise it might become hard to change all the test collections later...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.