Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:05:51 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: cluts review On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:55:01PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > On 07/13/2011 06:03 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > >I got lots of errors from "numeric" - I didn't bother recording most. > >The above are just a few of them. > > In my opinion, the errors are warranted. Quite possibly they are. I did not review them at all. I am leaving that for you and Rich. > >The 'numeric' test collection failed 16384 test(s). > > Hmm, is it an up-to-date version of cluts.c? The number is overblown. cluts as of 10 hours ago or so. > >Test collections passed: 1/4 > > > >This is the known issue with number of failed test collections, right? > >Should have been 2, I guess. > > This is the number of passed collections. I don't know why it says "out > of four" here, if you still have the buf.c-less version :-/ This version did have buf.c. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.