Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:54:42 +0200 From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Unit tests Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> writes: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: >> I've come up with "C Library Unit Test Suite" - cluts, which sounds like >> "klutz" (besides being klutzy of itself). > > "cluts" sounds good to me. > > What license is it going to be under? I propose cut-down BSD (to the > point of being copyright only, with no restrictions): > > This software is Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME <your at e-mail.address>, > and it is hereby released to the general public under the following terms: > > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > modification, are permitted. > > This should be compatible with any other Open Source license, which I > think is a plus. We currently use this for contributions to JtR: > > http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing > > I see little reason to have GPL-like restrictions on the unit tests; > I think that would do more harm than good. A court-proven formulation of this is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license I think. > Alexander -- Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...il.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.