Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:36:05 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Unit tests On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > I've come up with "C Library Unit Test Suite" - cluts, which sounds like > "klutz" (besides being klutzy of itself). "cluts" sounds good to me. What license is it going to be under? I propose cut-down BSD (to the point of being copyright only, with no restrictions): This software is Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME <your at e-mail.address>, and it is hereby released to the general public under the following terms: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted. This should be compatible with any other Open Source license, which I think is a plus. We currently use this for contributions to JtR: http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing I see little reason to have GPL-like restrictions on the unit tests; I think that would do more harm than good. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.