Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:46:21 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: keep discussion threads separate (was: Simple testing task - string functions) JIghtuse - On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:25:59PM +0700, JIghtuse wrote: > I have some questions about my task. I've written a program to test > malloc() function of musl. But.. That's great, but why are you posting to the thread about "string functions" (a task for Luka)? Please be careful to post to the proper thread. I suggest that you re-post your message to the proper thread now (by replying to Rich's message with your task definition), quoting some relevant context, and any replies should be posted to that other message (in the proper thread). Otherwise, we'll mix the two threads up badly. Please note that threading typically works based on Message-ID, In-Reply-To, and References headers, not on Subjects (although this is sometimes done as well). So simply setting the Subject to match that of the right thread won't be enough. Please actually locate Rich's message that you want to reply to, and use the reply feature of your MUA on it. That message was: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:34:02 -0400 To: musl@...ts.openwall.com From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> Subject: Re: [musl] GSoC You may optionally change the Subject to "malloc testing (was: GSoC)" (notice how the previous Subject is preserved after "was:"). To learn on what context to quote and how, please refer to: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/mail-news-errors.html http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Thanks, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.