[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:39:32 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Daurnimator <quae@...rnimator.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.de>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] io_uring: add IOURING_REGISTER_RESTRICTIONS opcode
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 01:26:41AM +1100, Daurnimator wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>> + __u8 register_op; /* IORING_RESTRICTION_REGISTER_OP */
>
>Can you confirm that this intentionally limited the future range of
>IORING_REGISTER opcodes to 0-255?
>
It was based on io_uring_probe, so we used u8 for opcodes, but we have
room to extend it in the future.
So, for now, this allow to register restrictions up to 255
IORING_REGISTER opcode.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
