Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:22:47 -0700 From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>, "VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>, Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>, Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>, Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>, Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] x86: PIE support to extend KASLR randomization On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:55 PM Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:51 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:43:47PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:12:44PM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > > These patches make some of the changes necessary to build the kernel as > > > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. Another patchset will > > > > add the PIE option and larger architecture changes. > > > > > > Yeah, about this: do we have a longer writeup about the actual benefits > > > of all this and why we should take this all? After all, after looking > > > at the first couple of asm patches, it is posing restrictions to how > > > we deal with virtual addresses in asm (only RIP-relative addressing in > > > 64-bit mode, MOVs with 64-bit immediates, etc, for example) and I'm > > > willing to bet money that some future unrelated change will break PIE > > > sooner or later. > > The goal is being able to extend the range of addresses where the > kernel can be placed with KASLR. I will look at clarifying that in the > future. > > > > > Possibly objtool can help here; it should be possible to teach it about > > these rules, and then it will yell when violated. That should avoid > > regressions. > > > > I will look into that as well. Following a discussion with Kees. I will explore objtool in the follow-up patchset as we still have more elaborate pie changes in the second set. I like the idea overall and I think it would be great if it works.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.