Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:54:00 +0200 From: Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman0x666@...il.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, nathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 김인겸 <ovich00@...il.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, nigel.edwards@....com, Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>, Hossam Hassan <7ossam9063@...il.com>, Ahmed Lotfy <A7med.lotfey@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/8] KVM: X86: Introducing ROE Protection Kernel Hardening Hello, > Do you have patches that enable usage of ROE in the kernel? > Alternatively you can write testcases in tools/testing/selftests/kvm to > test how guests should use it. As for now ROE isn't integrated yet into the kernel, I did have some tests I will have them in selftests/kvm in the next patch set > I would remove CONFIG_KVM_ROE altogether. You can enable it > unconditionally. Noted, I will have it enabled unconditionally in the next patch set. > I will continue reviewing the patches soon. > > Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.