Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:05:45 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <>
To: Kees Cook <>,
	Alexander Popov <>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <>, Andy Lutomirski <>,
	Kernel Hardening <>,
	PaX Team <>,
	Brad Spengler <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>, Tycho Andersen <>,
	Laura Abbott <>,
	Mark Rutland <>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	"Dmitry V . Levin" <>, X86 ML <>,
	Mohamed Ghannam <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test
 for it

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:17:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Alexander Popov <> wrote:
> > On 16.02.2018 21:10, Alexander Popov wrote:
> >> This is the 8th version of the patch series introducing STACKLEAK to the
> >> mainline kernel. I've made some minor improvements while waiting for the
> >> next review by x86 maintainers.
> If we can borrow some of luto or tglx's time, I think that'd be best:

Btw, someone just noticed: why hasn't this patchset ever been sent to
lkml for a wider review?


Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.