[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:39:15 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] efi/libstub: arm: reserve bootloader supplied
initrd in memory map
On 21 August 2017 at 11:37, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Under KASLR, the EFI stub may allocate the kernel anywhere in the
>> physical address space, which could be right on top of an initrd
>> if it was supplied by the bootloader (i.e., GRUB) in /chosen rather
>> than passed via the initrd= command line option. So allocate the
>> pages explicitly, this ensures that the random memory allocation
>> routine will disregard the region.
>
> I'm a little confused. Shouldn't the bootloader have allocated that
> memory, leaving it reserved?
>
> If it hasn't, then that region could be allcoated by anything else at
> any time (e.g. by the code which loads the kernel, or some EFI timer
> callback), so that sounds like a bootloader bug that we can't fix.
>
Yeah, thinko on my part. Thanks for spotting that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
