Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:03:30 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com CC: keescook@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, labbott@...hat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Provide linux/set_memory.h On 06/29/2017 08:29 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Currently code that wants to use set_memory_ro() etc, needs to include > asm/set_memory.h, which doesn't exist on all arches. Some code knows > it only builds on arches which have the header, other code guards the > inclusion with an #ifdef, neither is ideal. > > So create linux/set_memory.h. This always exists, so users don't need > an #ifdef just to include the header. > > When CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY=y it includes asm/set_memory.h, > otherwise it provides empty non-failing implementations. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> Looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> I'm fine if Andrew or Kees picks up the bpf patch as well, I think there shouldn't be any conflict with net-next on this one (and even if so, then looks trivial to resolve).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.