Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:05:38 -0700
From: Kees Cook <>
To: Shubham Bansal <>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <>, David Miller <>, 
	Mircea Gherzan <>, Network Development <>, 
	"" <>, 
	"" <>,
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Shubham Bansal
<> wrote:
> These all benchmarks are for ARMv7.

Thanks! In the future, try to avoid the white-space damage
(line-wrapping). And it looks like you've still got debugging turned
on in your jit code:

[   56.176033] test_bpf: #21 LD_CPU
[   56.176329] bpf_jit: *** NOT YET: opcode 85 ***
[   56.176565] jited:0 2639 702 PASS

That breaks the test report line. After I cleaned these up and parsed
the results, they look great. Most things are half the speed of the
interpreter, if not better. Only the LD_ABS suffered, and that's
mainly the const blinding, I assume.

Please post your current patch. Thanks for this!


Kees Cook
Pixel Security

View attachment "jitted.txt" of type "text/plain" (29420 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.