Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:31:19 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sharma Bhupesh <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>,
	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual
 base of the kernel region

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:21:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:50:10 Mark Rutland wrote:
> > 
> > > - once we have a random number in the bootloader, we should also pass that
> > >   through a DT property. This has been discussed multiple times in the past
> > >   and I think we had reached consensus already but don't know if we had
> > >   agreed on a specific DT property that contains the random number seed.
> > 
> > Any links for this? I don't recall spotting this discussion.
> 
> One discussion I found in the mail archives is in this thread
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/518, I also remember discussing it in person
> at some conference, obviously no archive of that.

Thanks for the pointer!

Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.