Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:21:05 +0100 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sharma Bhupesh <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>, Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel region On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:50:10 Mark Rutland wrote: > > > - once we have a random number in the bootloader, we should also pass that > > through a DT property. This has been discussed multiple times in the past > > and I think we had reached consensus already but don't know if we had > > agreed on a specific DT property that contains the random number seed. > > Any links for this? I don't recall spotting this discussion. One discussion I found in the mail archives is in this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/518, I also remember discussing it in person at some conference, obviously no archive of that. Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.