[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:21:05 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sharma Bhupesh <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>, Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] arm64: introduce KIMAGE_VADDR as the virtual base of the kernel region
On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:50:10 Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > - once we have a random number in the bootloader, we should also pass that
> > through a DT property. This has been discussed multiple times in the past
> > and I think we had reached consensus already but don't know if we had
> > agreed on a specific DT property that contains the random number seed.
>
> Any links for this? I don't recall spotting this discussion.
One discussion I found in the mail archives is in this thread
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/518, I also remember discussing it in person
at some conference, obviously no archive of that.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
