|
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:06:37 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Project convention on configuration options On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:24 PM, HacKurx <hackurx@...il.com> wrote: > First, respect the work of others... > https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/636677916365996032 What? You might want to read through the archives. We, of course, give credit. Just look at my attempts to port __read_only. PaX and Grsecurity are credited. Emese is actively involved in getting CII funding for upstream porting work, and PaX Team will comment now and then too. I see no lack of respect. > So I hope you are not here for nothing... > Sorry for such a comment here but I don't like attitude of your enterprise. I'm sorry you feel that way. What led you to thinking we had a bad attitude about our efforts to bring PaX and Grsecurity features into mainline? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.