Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 21:24:57 +0100 From: HacKurx <hackurx@...il.com> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Project convention on configuration options First, respect the work of others... https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/636677916365996032 So I hope you are not here for nothing... Sorry for such a comment here but I don't like attitude of your enterprise. 2015-12-11 18:57 GMT+01:00 Schaufler, Casey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>: > > > I’m starting to look at PAX_USERCOPY and immediately hit > the question of what to do about configuration option name. > I assume that retaining PAX_USERCOPY is not the right thing > to do, but what should be used instead? HARD_USERCOPY? > > Thanks. > > -- Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.