Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:23:14 -0400
From: Corey Bryant <>
To: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening
 mailing list

On 09/25/2012 12:02 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
>> The charter of the workgroup is to provide on-going security
>> verification of Linux kernel subsystems in order to assist in securing
>> the Linux Kernel and maintain trust and confidence in the security of
>> the Linux ecosystem.
>> This may include, but is not limited to, topics such as tooling to
>> assist in securing the Linux Kernel, verification and testing of
>> critical subsystems for vulnerabilities, security improvements for build
>> tools, and providing guidance for maintaining subsystem security.
>> Would it be okay if we used the kernel-hardening mailing list for
>> communication?
> Of course!  Please do.

Excellent, thanks!  Should we tag our subjects with anything?  I was 
thinking "lswg: ".

>> If our traffic ever gets to be too much
> This would be a good problem to have (well, assuming that list traffic
> correlates with actual progress).


> Alexander

Corey Bryant

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.