Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 18:17:53 +0100 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: dmg-opencl low performance/ low gpu utilisation On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 05:09:30PM +0100, r.wiesbach@....de wrote: > >Given these, I recommend that you specify explicit "-lws 64 -gws 73728" > >on the command-line. > Just for other readers: the = is missing there Oh, indeed, should be "-lws=64 -gws=73728". Sorry. And, also for other readers, indeed optimal numbers will most likely be different for other GPUs and other formats. We generally don't recommend specifying these at all, but sometimes it helps to obtain the numbers from auto-tuning and then just use them explicitly. > it seems that I can also use the fixed parameters together with --restore, > which is very nice. (At least john does not complain about option clash) I had actually tried this before sending my previous message, and found that it works in 1.9.0-jumbo-1, but that we broke it very recently. We now have a GitHub issue to make it work again: https://github.com/openwall/john/issues/4502 Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.