[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 19:58:43 +0100
From: <querty@...oste.net>
To: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>, <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: PKCS#12 RFC7292 appendix B implementation ?
Hi,
Do you think possible to forecast that KDF in futur work?
Regards.
Le 18 novembre 2019 10:07:31 querty@...oste.net a écrit :
> Hash function can be sha1 or sha256.
> Password are unicode ending with \0\0 utf-16-be coded like here:
> password = (unicode(self._password) + u'\0').encode('utf-16-be')
>
> Regards
>
> Le 18 novembre 2019 00:04:52 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> On 2019-11-17 14:23, Guillaume wrote:
>>> Does PKCS#12, RFC7292 appendix B "Deriving Keys and IVs from Passwords
>>> and Salt"
>>>
>>>
>>> KDF will be implemented? (possibly as a OpenCL kernel?)
>>
>> I'm not aware of it being present in our tree. Should be easy to
>> implement though.
>>
>>> It's used in PRIM'X ZED encrypted container.
>>
>> OK, but using what hash function H? Also, are they encoding the password
>> like the RFC example - using UCS2, big-endian and including a trailing
>> 0x0000, or are they doing it per the recommendation right before that
>> example - using ASCII or UTF-8? And if the latter, are they including a
>> trailing 0x00 or not?
>>
>> magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
