Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 15:39:58 +0100 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Getting full performance out of multiple GPU's On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:15:58PM +0100, Piotr Dobrogost wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > GPU memory utilization may > > vary depending on actual needs - there's no universally correct/expected > > level of GPU memory utilization. > > True but still you expected near 100% and I think it's reasonable > expectation. No, I didn't expect that and it's not a reasonable expectation. magnum has just illustrated that with an example. Let's troubleshoot the low GPU time utilization: > Command is > $ john --format=gpg-opencl --fork=8 --dev=2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 test.txt.gpg Oh, OK. So, as seen per the log file you sent you have a young session that is still frequently switching between incremental mode's lengths, trying to test candidate passwords in a more optimal order. To achieve a steady speed in terms of candidate passwords tested per second, and full GPU utilization, you'll need to either let this session run for much longer or instead run attacks that are a better fit for in those terms right away - such as locking incremental mode to a specific length (with "--min-length" and "--max-length") or running a large wordlist. Please try that and let us know of the results. > where test.txt.gpg is result of > $ gpg --symmetric --passphrase 'ala ma kota' test.txt This passphrase is unlikely to be cracked against that file type soon, unless you focus the attack. > john.log: Actually, I meant output seen on the terminal - not the log file - but this works, too. It's missing the reported speeds, though. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.